Connect with us

Business

Civitas Resources, Inc. Announces Pricing of Secondary Public Offering of Common Stock By An Affiliate of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board

Published

on



DENVER–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Civitas Resources, Inc. (NYSE: CIVI) (Civitas or the Company) announced today the pricing of an underwritten public offering of an aggregate of 6,956,520 shares of its common stock (the Offering) by an affiliate of Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (the Selling Stockholder) at a price to the public of $73.80 per share. Civitas is not selling any shares of common stock in the Offering and will not receive any proceeds from any sale of shares by the Selling Stockholder. The Offering is expected to close on May 20, 2024, subject to customary closing conditions.

BofA Securities is acting as sole underwriter for the Offering. The underwriter may offer the shares of common stock from time to time for sale in one or more transactions on the New York Stock Exchange, in the over-the-counter market, through negotiated transactions, or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to prevailing market prices, or at negotiated prices. The underwriter will have a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,043,478 shares of common stock from the Selling Stockholder.

A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and was effective upon filing. The Offering is being made only by means of a prospectus supplement and accompanying base prospectus. Before investing, prospective investors should read the prospectus supplement, the accompanying base prospectus, and the documents incorporated by reference therein for more complete information about the Company and the Offering. Copies of the preliminary prospectus supplement and accompanying base prospectus relating to the Offering, as well as copies of the final prospectus supplement once available, may be obtained from BofA Securities, NC1-022-02-25, 201 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC 28255-0001, Attention: Prospectus Department or by email at dg.prospectus_requests@bofa.com.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or
remove ads
.

This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, nor shall there be any sale of any securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.

About Civitas

Civitas Resources, Inc. is an independent, domestic oil and gas producer focused on development of its premier assets in the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) and Permian Basins. Civitas has a proven business model combining capital discipline, a strong balance sheet, cash flow generation and sustainable cash returns to shareholders. Civitas employs leading ESG practices and is Colorado’s first carbon neutral oil and gas producer.

Forward-Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements

Certain statements in this press release, including those that express belief, expectation, or intention, are forward-looking statements based on assumptions currently believed to be valid. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical facts. The words anticipate, believe, ensure, expect, if, intend, estimate, probable, project, forecasts, predict, outlook, aim, will, could, should, would, potential, may, might, anticipate, likely, plan, positioned, strategy, and similar expressions or other words of similar meaning, and the negatives thereof, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Specific forward-looking statements include statements regarding the Company’s plans and expectations with respect to the Offering, including the expected closing of the Offering. The forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or
remove ads
.

The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside the Company’s control, and which may cause actual results and future trends to differ materially from those matters expressed in, or implied or projected by, such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those described in forward-looking statements include, without limitation, Civitas’ future financial condition, results of operations, strategy and plans; changes in capital markets and the ability of Civitas to finance operations in the manner expected; the effects of commodity prices; the risks of oil and gas activities; and the fact that operating costs and business disruption may be greater than expected.

Additional information concerning other factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described above can be found under Item 1A. Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis sections in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other filings made with the SEC, each of which is on file with the SEC.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on information available at the time they were made. The Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements were made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events except as required by federal securities laws. As forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, caution should be exercised against placing undue reliance on such statements.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or
remove ads
.

Investor Relations:
Brad Whitmarsh, 832.736.8909, bwhitmarsh@civiresources.com
Kara English, 303.312.8790, kenglish@civiresources.com

Media:
Rich Coolidge, info@civiresources.com

Source: Civitas Resources, Inc.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

How to watch, stream the Opening Ceremonies of the Paris Olympics live online free without cable

Published

on



On the heels of low ratings for the coronavirus pandemic-marred Tokyo and Beijing OlympicsParis may not do much better among U.S. viewers, a poll from Gallup released Thursday found.

Simone Biles and women’s gymnastics are poised to be a bright spot, with those surveyed selecting it as their most anticipated sport.

But according to the poll, 30% of respondents said they will not watch any of the Games, 34% said they will not watch much and 35% said they would watch at least a fair amount. That last figure is down from the 48% measured before the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. Gallup did not measure viewing intentions for the Tokyo Olympics, which were delayed a year.

NBC’s prime-time coverage of the Tokyo Olympics mostly drew about half the audience of its Summer Games predecessor. The Beijing Olympics had the lowest-ever U.S. audience for a Winter Games. Both Games were held under severe restrictions, limiting spectators and dampening the typical fanfare. NBC, which holds the U.S. broadcasting rights through 2032, is trying to turn around that trend by enlisting a slew of entertainers and non-Olympian athletes in its coverage.

The last three Olympics, including the 2018 Pyeongchang Games, were held in time zones that limited how much live action NBC could air in prime time.

The network did not immediately respond to The Associated Press’ request for comment on the poll. Biles and the rest of the U.S. gymnastics squad could bring in high ratings, though, with Gallup finding in general that women’s sports were as anticipated as men’s. Forty-two percent chose women’s gymnastics as their most anticipated sport, while around two-thirds of respondents ranked it in their top three. That competition begins with qualifying on Sunday.

Recommended Newsletter: The Fortune Next to Lead newsletter is a must-read for the next generation of C-suite leaders. Every Monday, the newsletter provides the strategies, resources, and expert insight needed to claim the most coveted positions in business. Subscribe now. Sign up for free.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

MMM, DXCM, SG, TXRH and more

Published

on




Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Drivers still pay too much for fuel, warns watchdog

Published

on


Getty Images Young man wearing a blue striped T-shirt filling a car with petrolGetty Images

Drivers are still paying too much for fuel, the UK’s competition watchdog has warned, with high prices costing motorists £1.6bn last year alone.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said that weakened competition in the fuel sector is impacting drivers’ wallets.

It found that supermarkets’ profit margins – which is the difference between the price they buy fuel at and what they charge motorists – had doubled since 2019.

The CMA is calling for more pressure on supermarkets so they “have to offer better prices because they know that they can’t rip consumers off”, chief executive, Sarah Cardell told the BBC’s Today programme.

“When it comes to road fuel, the simple answer is that drivers are still paying too much,” she added.

The watchdog said the margins that supermarkets are charging drivers are double what they were in 2019.

The CMA began investigating the road fuel market last year and, at the time, made a series of recommendations to help drivers cut the cost of filling their tanks.

These included setting up fuel finder scheme that could help motorists find the cheapest fuel in their area using map apps and sat-navs.

But Ms Cardell said: “One year on and drivers are still paying too much.”

Motoring group RAC said drivers paying £1.6bn more than they should have “is nothing short of outrageous.”

“Drivers have every right to feel ripped off, especially knowing there is virtually no market competition between retailers,” said RAC head of policy Simon Williams.

Ms Cardell said it would work with the new government to help them to bring a “real-time fuel finder scheme” into effect, showing drivers where the cheapest prices were available.

The CMA claimed the scheme could save drivers up to £4.50 each time they refuel.

A number of major retailers now contribute to the voluntary price data sharing scheme but the CMA has called on the government to put a compulsory system in place.

A spokesperson for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, said “Retailers must give drivers a fair price for their fuel, by passing on any savings at the pump.”

It said Energy Secretary Ed Miliband would consider the CMA’s findings and would provide updates “in due course”.

Figures from the watchdog revealed that in 2019, supermarkets were making a margin of 4.4% on fuel but that has nearly doubled to 8%.

Non-supermarket petrol stations made a 6.8% margin five years ago. It is now 8.5%.

The AA backed the need for a “mandatory ‘pump watch’ scheme”.

It would allow drivers, said AA president Edmund King, to “clearly see which fuel outlets are ripping them off”.

The CMA said that in prior years fuel had been relatively competitive because supermarkets such as Asda and, to some extent, Morrisons had led with lower prices.

However, Ms Cardell said: “Asda decided to increase the fuel margins that they wanted to get and instead of seeing any kind of competitive response from other retailers, all the other retailers let their margins drift up at the same time.”

It is “drivers who have paid the price” for this, she said.

Last year, the CMA released a report that noted Asda and Morrisons were both purchased by private equity firms in 2021, which was the same year the supermarkets made a decision to increase their target margin on fuel.

Asda was bought in 2021 by brothers Zuba and Moshin Issa and TDR Capital.

The billionaire Issa brothers bought half of the supermarket for £6.8bn and also own hundreds of petrol stations.

Morrisons was bought by private equity firm Clayton, Dubilier & Rice for £7bn in October 2021 after a bidding war.

The BBC has contacted Asda and other major supermarkets for comment.

The British Retail Consortium said: “Retailers will continue to work closely with the CMA and provide the necessary data to allow consumers to find the best prices for petrol and diesel.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2024 World Daily Info. Powered by Columba Ventures Co. Ltd.