Connect with us

Business

Explainer-US limits on PFAS in drinking water could fuel litigation By Reuters

Published

on


By Clark Mindock

(Reuters) – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has finalized the first federal regulations on toxic “forever chemicals” in drinking water, setting tight limits that essentially require public water systems to all but eliminate their presence in American tap water.

The highly anticipated rules target six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, that are commonly used to make thousands of commercial and consumer products like semiconductors, firefighting foams and stain resistant fabrics.

PFAS are known as forever chemicals because they do not easily break down in the environment or in the human body, and they have been linked to cancers and other health concerns.

Here is what you need to know.

WHAT DOES THE RULE DO?

The EPA’s rule issued on Wednesday under the Safe Drinking Water Act sets strict limits ranging from 4 to 10 parts per trillion for five individual kinds of PFAS, and includes limits for several other PFAS if they are present in combination in water.

All public water systems have three years to complete their monitoring for these chemicals and must inform the public of the level of PFAS measured in their drinking water.

In cases where PFAS is found at levels that exceed the standards, the water systems are required to implement measures to reduce PFAS in their drinking water within five years.

HOW DOES THIS RULE FIT IN WITH OTHER PFAS REGULATIONS?

The rule is the most aggressive regulation yet under the EPA’s so-called “PFAS roadmap.”

The agency previously bolstered requirements that manufacturing facilities report their use and disposal of PFAS, and issued a rule preventing companies from using PFAS in new manufacturing processes without EPA approval, among other things.

Going forward, the agency is expected to finalize rules designating at least two PFAS as hazardous substances under the U.S. Superfund law, which could expose many industries to potential cleanup liability.

ARE LEGAL CHALLENGES TO THE RULE LIKELY?

Legal experts say court challenges seeking to block the rule are likely to be filed by manufacturers, business groups and potentially water systems themselves.

The challengers are likely to argue that the EPA’s rules were crafted without adequately considering the cost of compliance or without adequate evidence showing the need for the rules, in violation of requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act and federal administrative law.

The National Association of Manufacturers, the American Chemistry Council and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said in comments last year to a draft version of the rule that it overstated the benefits of imposing the limits while underestimating costs. Water utility industry groups said in comments that compliance could cost water systems billions of dollars.

Texas, which has frequently challenged Biden administration rules in court, has called elements of the rule “oversimplistic” and said it would be difficult for small water systems to comply given the costs.

HOW WILL THE RULE BE ENFORCED?

Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, most states are given primary enforcement authority to ensure drinking water standards are met. The EPA typically gets involved when states are not enforcing the requirements or are otherwise unsuccessful in enforcement efforts.

State and federal regulators can issue administrative orders that lay out steps for water systems to come into compliance, file legal actions or fine water systems that are not meeting the standards. Experts say any future fines are likely years away, and would come after numerous warnings.

Citizens can also sue the government or water systems under the law to force compliance.

COULD THE STANDARDS BOLSTER EXISTING LAWSUITS?

Lawsuits brought by hundreds of water systems against chemical manufacturers accusing them of negligence and of creating a nuisance by contaminating water with PFAS have already yielded major settlements.

Last year, 3M reached a settlement worth $10.3 billion with water systems across the U.S. that will help pay to clean up drinking water contaminated with PFAS, while DuPont de Nemours (NYSE:) Inc, Chemours and Corteva (NYSE:) reached a similar deal worth $1.19 billion.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Tap water flows out of a faucet in New York June 14, 2009. REUTERS/Eric Thayer/File Photo

The settlements were a part of sprawling multidistrict litigation (MDL) in South Carolina federal court, where other pending lawsuits against manufacturers may ultimately yield more money for the water systems.

The new rule could make it easier for water systems that are suing or considering suing companies that produce or use PFAS near them for polluting waterways with the chemicals. Legal experts say that is because the rules create an unambiguous standard for what levels of PFAS in drinking water are acceptable, and so could make it easier for water systems to prove they have been harmed by the pollution.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

John Cena announces retirement from in-ring competition in 2025, WWE says By Reuters

Published

on

By


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Apr 1, 2023; inglewood, CA, USA; John Cena during Wrestlemania Night 1 at SoFi Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Joe Camporeale-USA TODAY Sports/File Photo

(Reuters) – U.S. wrestling superstar and actor John Cena announced retirement from in-ring competition in 2025, World Wrestling (NYSE:) Entertainment (WWE) said in a post on social media platform X on Saturday.

“John Cena announces retirement from in-ring competition, stating that WrestleMania 41 in Las Vegas will be his last,” WWE said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Recession indicator is close to sounding the alarm as unemployment rises

Published

on



While unemployment is still historically low, its rate of increase could be a sign of deteriorating economic conditions. That’s where the so-called Sahm Rule comes in.

It says that when the three-month moving average of the jobless rate rises by at least a half-percentage point from its low during the previous 12 months, then a recession has started. This rule would have signaled every recession since 1970.

Based on the latest unemployment figures from the Labor Department’s monthly report on Friday, the gap between the two has expanded to 0.43 in June from 0.37 in May.

It’s now at the highest level since March 2021, when the economy was still recovering from the pandemic-induced crash.

The creator of the rule, Claudia Sahm, was an economist at the Federal Reserve and is now chief economist at New Century Advisors. She has previously explained that even from low levels a rising unemployment rate can set off a negative feedback loop that leads to a recession.

“When workers lose paychecks, they cut back on spending, and as businesses lose customers, they need fewer workers, and so on,” she wrote in a Bloomberg opinion column in November, adding that once this feedback loop starts, it is usually self-reinforcing and accelerates.

But she also said the pandemic may have caused so many disruptions in the economy and the labor market that indicators like the Sahm Rule that are based on unemployment may not be as accurate right now.

A few weeks ago, however, Sahm told CNBC that the Federal Reserve risks sending the economy into a recession by continuing to hold off on rate cuts.

“My baseline is not recession,” she said on June 18. “But it’s a real risk, and I do not understand why the Fed is pushing that risk. I’m not sure what they’re waiting for.”

That came days after the Fed’s June policy meeting when central bankers kept rates steady after holding them at 5.25%-5.5%—the highest since 2001—since July 2023.

The Fed meets again at the end of this month and is expected to remain on hold, but odds are rising that a cut could happen in September.

Sahm also said last month that the Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s stated preference to wait for a deterioration in job gains is a mistake and that policymakers should instead focus on the rate of change in the labor market.

“We’ve gone into recession with all different levels of unemployment,” she explained. “These dynamics feed on themselves. If people lose their jobs, they stop spending, [and] more people lose jobs.”

Meanwhile, Wall Street has had a more sanguine view of the economy, citing last year’s widespread recession predictions that proved wrong as well as the AI boom that’s helping to fuel a wave of investment and earnings growth.

Last month, Neuberger Berman senior portfolio manager Steve Eisman also pointed to the boost in infrastructure spending.

“We’re just powering through, and I think the only conclusion you can reach is that the U.S. economy is more dynamic than it’s ever been in its history,” he told CNBC.

Subscribe to the CEO Daily newsletter to get global CEO perspectives on the biggest stories in business. Sign up for free.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Joe Biden rejects calls to quit presidential race as clamour grows for his exit

Published

on


Joe Biden faced a growing clamour among Democrats to drop out of the 2024 presidential race on the weekend despite stepped-up public appearances aimed at proving he is mentally fit to take on Donald Trump.

Biden has two campaign events in the swing state of Pennsylvania on Sunday after a high-stakes primetime interview on Friday night failed to reassure fellow Democrats panicked by the 81-year-old’s shaky debate performance last week.

“It’s the worst possible outcome,” one veteran Democratic operative told the Financial Times after Biden’s interview aired on ABC News. “Not nearly strong enough to make us feel better, but not weak enough to convince Jill [Biden] to urge him to pull the plug.”

David Axelrod, the architect of Barack Obama’s successful 2008 presidential campaign, warned after the interview that Biden was “dangerously out-of-touch with the concerns people have about his capacities moving forward and his standing in this race”.

The roll call of Democrats calling for Biden to withdraw was joined on Saturday by Angie Craig, a House member from a swing district in Minnesota.

“President Biden is a good man & I appreciate his lifetime of service,” Craig wrote on social media platform X.

“But I believe he should step aside for the next generation of leadership. The stakes are too high.”

NBC News reported that the Democratic leader in the House, Hakeem Jeffries, was set to discuss the president’s candidacy among colleagues on Sunday.

Throughout the roughly 20-minute interview on ABC, Biden rejected opinion polls that show him trailing Trump both nationwide and in the pivotal swing states that will determine the election outcome.

“I don’t think anybody is more qualified to be president or win this race than me,” Biden said.

The president also dodged questions about whether he would be willing to undergo cognitive and neurological testing, at one point replying: “I have a cognitive test every single day, every day I have that test.”

Biden added: “You know, not only am I campaigning, I am running the world . . . for example, today, before I came out here, I am on the phone with the prime minister of, well anyway, I shouldn’t get into the detail, with Netanyahu, I’m on the phone with the new prime minister of England.” The president appeared to be referencing a call he had on Thursday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and another on Friday with new UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer.

In another exchange, Biden appeared to suggest that nobody would be able to convince him to suspend his re-election bid, saying: “If the Lord almighty tells me to, I might do that.”

“It seems that the only person who still believes Biden should still be in the race is Biden,” said one top Democratic donor. Another Democratic donor called the interview “pathetic”, while another said it was “too little, too late”.

Many Democratic lawmakers, party operatives and influential donors have privately called for Biden to suspend his re-election campaign after last week’s debate reignited questions about the president’s age and fitness for office. But more critics have been willing to go public with their concerns in recent days.

Maura Healey, the Democratic governor of Massachusetts, became the first state governor to suggest Biden step aside on Friday. Healey was among governors who met the president for emergency talks at the White House this week.

She issued a statement urging him to “listen to the American people and carefully evaluate whether he remains our best hope to defeat Donald Trump”.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported on Friday that Mark Warner, a senator from Virginia, was working to assemble a group of Democratic senators to ask Biden to exit the race. A spokesperson for Warner did not respond to a request for comment.

Earlier on Friday, Biden delivered a defiant speech in Wisconsin, a swing state, telling a crowd of supporters that he would not bow to the mounting pressure on him to quit.

“Let me say this as clearly as I can: I’m staying in the race. I’ll beat Donald Trump.”

Reporters travelling with Biden noted several people standing outside the venue where he spoke in Wisconsin holding signs urging him to “bow out” and “pass the torch”. Another sign read: “Give it up, Joe.”

His campaign on Friday said it would spend another $50mn on advertising in the month of July, including for ad spots that would run during this month’s Republican National Convention and the Olympics.

Biden’s vice-president Kamala Harris, California governor Gavin Newsom and Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer — all seen as possible candidates should Biden step aside — have remained publicly loyal to the president’s campaign. At a July 4 celebration at the White House on Thursday evening, Biden joined hands with his vice-president as some people in the crowd chanted, “four more years”.

But other prominent Democrats are more reluctant to share the stage with the president. When Biden visited Wisconsin on Friday, he was joined by the state’s Democratic governor, Tony Evers — but not Tammy Baldwin, the state’s Democratic senator, who is polling far ahead of the president.

The latest FiveThirtyEight polling average shows Trump leading Biden by just shy of two points in Wisconsin.

Have your say

Joe Biden vs Donald Trump: tell us how the 2024 US election will affect you



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2024 World Daily Info. Powered by Columba Ventures Co. Ltd.