Connect with us

Business

Sweden’s Renewcell set out to enhance the sustainability of the fashion industry, but it filed for bankruptcy just a year later: ‘We were building the plane, flying it and then the runway was getting short’

Published

on



When Renewcell AB opened its inaugural commercial factory in 2022, it was hailed as a beacon of hope for a more sustainable future in fashion. Launched in a repurposed paper mill in Sweden, the world’s first industrial-scale textile-to-textile recycling plant represented a project of unparalleled ambition that would pave the way for an entire new industry. 

Just over a year later, on Feb. 26, Renewcell filed for bankruptcy. The decision came four months after the public company issued a profit warning over slow sales of Circulose, the biodegradable pulp it makes from worn-out clothes and cotton waste, which can be turned into fresh textile fiber. While Renewcell had signed supply agreements with two major fiber manufacturers — and could produce up to 60,000 metric tons of Circulose per year — it only sold 18,000 tons of the material in 2023, less than half of what it needed to break even. Multiple fiber manufacturers told Renewcell the same thing: They would only buy more pulp if fashion brands put in more orders for materials made from it.

“We thought we had like two-thirds of the plant sold out, and for a variety of reasons, those off-take agreements with fiber producers didn’t come through,” says Renewcell Chief Commercial Officer Tricia Carey. “We were building the plane, flying it and then the runway was getting short.”

Renewcell’s demise has sent shockwaves through the nascent new-materials sector, leaving many wondering what will become of investors’ appetite for textile innovation. It’s also highlighting the magnitude of the challenge ahead for the world’s biggest fashion brands as they aim to replace millions of tons of traditional textiles with sustainable alternatives that are still in development. Multiple global retailers, including Hennes & Mauritz AB and Zara parent Inditex SA, have announced targets to reduce their carbon footprints that rely at least in part on the adoption of new textiles. But the downfall of such a high-profile recycling operation casts a long shadow over the realism of those goals.

Renewcell launched in 2012 on the strength of a surprise discovery. Two professors who were developing an alternative to fossil fuel-derived methanol by breaking down cellulose — an organic compound in plant-based materials — found that their method also decomposed the cellulose in textiles. Along with a small group of investors, they set out to build a chemical recycling venture. By the time Renewcell presented its first dress made from Circulose in 2014, the company had rallied around a plan to reduce the millions of tons of virgin material used to make apparel, which contribute to a glut of fashion waste all over the world

That plan aligned with targets set by apparel makers. H&M has pledged that 30% of the materials it uses will be recycled by 2025, while Zara says 25% of its fibers will be “next-generation materials that do not yet exist at an industrial scale” by 2030. Renewcell started by collaborating with fashion brands on one-off collections made with Circulose. It then landed agreements with fiber manufacturers Tangshan Sanyou (in 2021) and Lenzing (2022), who agreed to buy up to 275,000 tons of Circulose pulp over five years. 

But those purchases weren’t fulfilled on time, according to Renewcell, and letters of intent with several other fiber suppliers never translated into firm orders. “The question is how many of these agreements turned into actual transactions,” says Tiffany Hua, an analyst at Lux Research, a research and advisory firm that focuses on emerging technologies, including new materials. “[Renewcell] didn’t have enough of a reliable market.”

Lenzing declined to comment on its deal with Renewcell, and Tangshan Sanyou did not respond to a request for comment. But according to Hua, Renewcell also ran into quality issues and manufacturing snags, including not getting a high enough yield — meaning a portion of what was recycled was unsellable.

“It is typical in a manufacturing startup to have sub-prime quality,” says Carey at Renewcell. “From our production experience, we had continuous improvement each month with [a] higher percentage of pulp within specification.”

In October, after Renewcell issued its profit warning, Zara said its suppliers would buy 2,000 tons of material blend through Tangshan Sanyou, which had an existing agreement with Renewcell. In December, H&M committed to using 18,000 tons of Circulose through 2025. (The fast fashion giant is also Renewcell’s second-largest shareholder). But it still wasn’t enough. 

“Somewhere between the step of setting up the factory and the real world, things didn’t work in the way they pitched it to their financiers,” says Richard Wielechowski, a senior investment analyst who specializes in textiles at think tank Planet Tracker.

Price played a big role in the lackluster demand. According to Renewcell, fibers made with Circulose cost almost a third more than the closest alternative, viscose, which is made with wood pulp. The company also struggled to navigate the web of suppliers between Circulose and the global fashion brands it aimed to serve, a process that added costs and hampered Renewcell’s ability to attract retailers while bleeding cash.  

“If you can get the industry who actually does the making on board, that’s the key to really changing what’s being used in our clothing,” says Wielechowski, who also points to the difficulty of doing textile innovation in Sweden when Renewcell’s direct customers are part of a supply chain scattered across the Southern hemisphere. “It’s a bit of a wake-up call in terms of the business model design,” he says. “You have your big factory in the North, but your actual customers are on the other side of the world.”

Hua at Lux Research says joint ventures between innovating companies and entrenched manufacturers — instead of typical purchase agreements — will be needed to introduce new materials more effectively and share the risks of scaling. Placing factories like Renewcell’s in Asia would also reduce startups’ reliance on shipping feedstock back and forth between continents. Some experts doubt fashion brands will be able to hit their climate targets unless the business model changes drastically. 

Until then, many more Renewcells — and many more commitments from suppliers and apparel makers — will be needed to move the needle. According to the nonprofit Textile Exchange, the fashion industry used the largest share of the 116 million tons of fiber that were produced in 2022, 92% of which was virgin fiber. Renewcell’s goal was to supply about 0.05% of the total. Infinited Fiber Company, a Finland-based rival, aims to produce 0.4% — 500,000 tons a year — by 2030. Circ, based in the US, plans to launch its first industrial plant next year with an annual capacity of 65,000 tons. 

Without more investment, demand for sustainable raw materials could exceed supply by 133 million tons by 2030, according to a report by consultancies BCG, Quantis and Textile Exchange. Separate research published by McKinsey last month found that two-thirds of fashion brands won’t be able to meet their sustainability targets unless they accelerate emissions reduction, and 40% have seen their emissions increase since making climate commitments. The study sampled 30 brands with combined revenues of more than $300 billion in 2022.

Wielechowski warns that if alternative fibers can’t scale successfully, synthetics will fill the gap. “You are up against cotton, but then you’re also up against synthetics, which are based on oil and are probably going to get cheaper because the big oil and gas players are busy swapping volumes into petrochemical products as gasoline demand goes down,” he says.

There are also questions about how much new materials will truly reduce fashion’s environmental footprint. One 2023 study by the IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute concluded that textile recycling would make a “relatively small contribution” — reducing carbon dioxide emissions from textile products purchased in the European Union by just 1.3% — although it would have more impact on land and water use.

Renewcell’s future is still being decided: The company received purchase offers through March 28, and is expecting to announce a winning bidder for its business this month. Since the bankruptcy, fallout in the rest of the industry has also been mixed. 

In February, US-based Evrnu, a recycler backed by Danish apparel company Bestseller and partnered with Adidas and Zara, delayed the building of its pilot facility to 2025, Apparel Insider reported. But a month later, H&M announced a deal to buy recycled polyester yarn from Syre, a US-based venture it founded in 2023 alongside Vargas Holding AB and asset manager TPG Inc. The agreement, worth $600 million over seven years, intends to cover a significant share of H&M’s long-term need for recycled polyester, Syre Chief Executive Officer Dennis Nobelius said in March. But the company’s first plant, set to open in North Carolina this year, will start with an annual production capacity of just 10,000 tons.

Two days after the H&M announcement, Infinited Fiber said it had raised €40 million ($43 million) from a group of investors including Inditex and the CEO of Uniqlo parent Fast Retailing Co. Infinited Fiber’s first industrial plant, in Finland, is set to open in 2025.

“It seems that there is still a strong investor interest,” says Infinited CEO Petri Alava. “It’s about selecting the kind of brands that have the resources, the size and capability of binding their operations into the new future.” Infinited is focusing on signing binding purchase agreements and has filled about 70% of its projected capacity, Alava says.

A spokesperson for Inditex says the company is working to provide “decisive support for the scale-up of new fibers and ensure their availability in the future, not only for us but also for the wider sector.” An H&M spokesperson says the company has “supported Renewcell since 2017” and “believed in their vision and business idea,” but cited the challenges of scaling and commercializing new technologies. The spokesperson pointed to H&M’s Syre deal as an example of how it will “continue to collaborate with other industry players and invest in new innovations and infrastructure.”

Circ CEO Peter Majeranowski says his company is weighing where to set up its first plant; Asia or Central America would put it closer to the supply of waste that feeds its materials. “We’re in many conversations about having these factories all over the world, including most especially the Global South,” Majeranowski says. “It makes a lot of sense to have these types of recycling facilities close to production.”

Still, Wielechowski at Planet Tracker wonders who will foot the roughly $400 billion bill for building out this new industry. “Realistically, if you ask the brands how it’s going to happen, they’re expecting someone else to do all the work for them, and then just be able to pick it up,” he says. “And that’s what Renewcell shows: It’s just not happening in the market.”



Source link

Business

Jefferies starts US Steel stock with Buy rating, highlights growth potential By Investing.com

Published

on



On Monday, Jefferies initiated coverage on (NYSE: X) stock with a Buy rating, accompanied by a price target set at $45.00. The firm’s analysis suggests that US Steel’s valuation stands out within its peer group, noting that the company’s share price is notably lower than the offer from Nippon, which has been accepted. As a result, the firm sees significant potential for the stock.

The coverage highlights US Steel’s growth potential, particularly from its Big River 2 project, which is expected to contribute to the company’s volume growth. The firm also anticipates that US Steel will benefit from its position as a blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) operator, sharing advantages with industry counterpart Cliffs, especially given its current product mix.

The rationale behind the Buy rating includes several key factors. Jefferies points out US Steel’s relatively high leverage, which could be favorable in a context of strong demand and possible price increases. The firm also favors BF-BOF operators in a robust macroeconomic environment.

Another significant factor for the positive outlook is the expected demand surge following the resolution of the United Auto Workers strike. The strike’s end was previously a catalyst for a sharp increase in flat-rolled steel prices in late 2023, and similar dynamics could unfold moving forward, potentially benefiting US Steel.

Jefferies’ coverage suggests a promising outlook for US Steel, underpinned by a combination of valuation appeal, growth prospects, and favorable industry conditions. The $45.00 price target reflects this optimism for the stock’s future performance.

InvestingPro Insights

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or
remove ads
.

As Jefferies initiates coverage on US Steel with a bullish stance, real-time data from InvestingPro reinforces the potential that analysts see in the company. With a market capitalization of $8.07 billion and a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio standing at 9.28, US Steel presents an investment profile that may appeal to value-oriented investors. The company’s adjusted P/E ratio has decreased to 8.02 in the last twelve months as of Q1 2024, indicating a potentially more attractive valuation compared to historical figures.

InvestingPro Tips highlight that US Steel has maintained dividend payments for 34 consecutive years, signaling a commitment to returning value to shareholders. Additionally, despite a decline in revenue growth by 12.6% in the last twelve months as of Q1 2024, the company remains profitable over the same period. These factors, combined with a solid track record of dividend payments, could be particularly reassuring for income-focused investors.

For those considering an investment in US Steel, there are 2 more InvestingPro Tips available that could provide further insights into the company’s prospects. To delve deeper into these expert analyses, visit https://www.investing.com/pro/X and don’t forget to use the exclusive coupon code PRONEWS24 to get an additional 10% off a yearly or biyearly Pro and Pro+ subscription.

This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi dead in helicopter crash

Published

on


Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi has died in a helicopter crash, state media reported on Monday.

The helicopter carrying the president came down on Sunday in a remote and mountainous region of the country’s north-west, according to Tasnim News Agency, which is closely linked to the elite Revolutionary Guard. Rescue teams battled for hours to reach the crash site, with fog and snow hindering efforts.

State media showed video footage of a convoy of ambulances struggling to make their way through fog up a mountain road. The crash site was in Arasbaran Forest near the border with Azerbaijan, according to Tasnim.

Helicopter Iranian president’s convoy crashes-2

Iran’s foreign minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian was also on board the helicopter as part of Raisi’s entourage.

They were returning from a visit to the country’s north-western province of East Azerbaijan, where they took part in the inauguration of a dam. The president of northern neighbour Azerbaijan was present at the ceremony as well.

Raisi, 63, was elected in 2021 in a vote with a record-low turnout in the country’s history. He had been expected to seek re-election next year, and his name had emerged in political circles as a top candidate to succeed Iran’s supreme leader, 85-year-old Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

The president showed unconditional loyalty to the ayatollah and maintained close relations with the Revolutionary Guard. After decades of tense relations between Iran’s presidents and the supreme leader over the extent of their powers, Raisi was the first to end these tensions.

This is a developing story



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

China’s EV makers are having more trouble paying their bills and now take 2 to 3 times longer than Tesla does

Published

on



The time it’s taking for some of China’s electric-car makers to pay suppliers is ballooning — a further sign of stress in the nation’s increasingly cutthroat auto market.

Nio Inc. was taking around 295 days to clear its receipts payable, the vast majority of which are owed to suppliers, at the end of 2023 versus 197 days in 2021, according to the most recent available data compiled by Bloomberg. Xpeng Inc., another US-listed Chinese EV maker, was taking 221 days to honor its obligations to vendors and related parties, up from 179 days, the data show.

Elon Musk’s Tesla Inc., by comparison, only took around 101 days, and that period has remained largely stable in the past three years.

The extended payment cycles are indicative of the pressure many automakers are under in China, where economic growth remains sluggish and consumer sentiment is subdued. That’s translated into reduced demand for electric cars, and the once fast-growing market is now beset with intense price wars and crunched profit margins.

Since Beijing phased out a national subsidy program for EV purchases in 2022, some smaller manufacturers have been pushed to the brink. WM Motors filed for restructuring in October, and Human Horizons Group Inc., the owner of premium EV brand HiPhi, suspended operations for at least six months in February.

“Everybody’s suffering,” said Jochen Siebert, managing director at consultancy JSC Automotive. “For manufacturers, price reductions mean less money coming in. So the money they owe to their suppliers may be necessary for them to remain liquid.”

Representatives for Nio and Xpeng didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Delayed payments are starting to have a knock-on effects at auto-parts suppliers, Siebert said.

“Tier-three or four suppliers really get bitten, because they can’t pass it on,” he said, adding the EV sector may see a “messy consolidation” as suppliers go bankrupt, quickly causing production issues for automakers down the line.

Indeed Jiaxing, Zhejiang-based Minth Group Ltd., a supplier of exterior body parts, saw its accounts and notes receivables surge more than 40% to 4.74 billion yuan ($656 million) as of December from the end of 2020, while its cash and equivalents shrank by almost one-third to 4.2 billion yuan over the same period, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Hunan Yuneng New Energy Battery Material Co., which is a major supplier to BYD Co., according to data compiled by Bloomberg, saw its accounts and notes receivables more than triple to 10.43 billion yuan at the end of 2022 from a year earlier, while cash reserves fell to 435.2 million yuan.

“The price war won’t end soon and the stress eventually will be delivered to suppliers,” said Zhu Lin, a Shanghai-based managing director with turnaround management firm Alvarez & Marsal.

“We’ve seen more car components producers approaching us to improve their performance and some of them are thinking about offloading unprofitable businesses,” Zhu said. “The weak ones in the supply chain will face a high risk of being kicked out of the game.”

Subscribe to the Eye on AI newsletter to stay abreast of how AI is shaping the future of business. Sign up for free.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2024 World Daily Info. Powered by Columba Ventures Co. Ltd.